Court in recess until Friday after jury said it’s in a standstill in Palisades Fire arson trial

Firefighters watch the flames from the Palisades Fire burning a home on January 8 in Los Angeles. (Apu Gomes/Getty Images via CNN Newsource)

Jurors in the U.S. federal trial of Palisades Fire suspect Jonathan Rinderknecht have concluded their second day of deliberations and will return Friday after they initially said they are at a standstill and could not reach a unanimous verdict.

Both the prosecution and defense agreed they needed more time to research after the jury sent a note saying, “We have people on both sides, dead set, unwavering to change their opinion, we are at standstill.”

The jury was sent a note that said, “The court will respond to your note when you return” Friday at 9 a.m. PT.

A deadlocked, or hung jury as it’s known, can lead the judge to declare a mistrial, ending the trial without a clear resolution.

Prosecutors called more than 30 witnesses over six days, painting Rinderknecht, 30, as a vengeful and angry person who they said ignited a blaze that later erupted into the Palisades Fire.

The Palisades Fire claimed the lives of a dozen people and scorched thousands of homes and businesses in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood in Los Angeles.

Rinderknecht pleaded not guilty to three federal charges: Destruction of property by means of fire, arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and timber set afire.

Prosecutors argued Rinderknecht was alone in a clearing on a Palisades hillside in the early hours of New Year’s Day 2025 when a fire, dubbed the Lachman Fire, broke out. Though firefighters suppressed the blaze soon after, an arson investigator testified the fire smoldered underground before heavy winds caused it to flare again on January 7, becoming the Palisades Fire.

Prosecutors contended Rinderknecht was motivated by his desire to seek revenge against society at large, and that he was angry at the wealthy and his inability to find companionship on New Year’s Eve.

Passengers driven by Rinderknecht – he was working as an Uber driver – testified he ranted about capitalism and was fixated by Luigi Mangione.

The defense acknowledged Rinderknecht saw flames while he was at the clearing – known as the Hidden Buddha – that night but emphasized he called 911 multiple times, though the calls could not immediately connect. Defense attorney Steve Haney argued no one saw his client light a fire, and he contended Rinderknecht had been made a scapegoat.

Rinderknecht’s attorneys called nine witnesses over about three days, including a consultant and former arson investigator who said there was not enough evidence to illustrate a serious intent to start a fire – and that fireworks were “the most obvious cause” of the blaze.

Testimony by other eyewitnesses was used to corroborate defense claims that New Year’s revelers were setting off fireworks in the area that night.

This is a developing story and will be updated.