Alberta invokes notwithstanding clause to stop court challenges of transgender laws

For the second time in less than a month, the Alberta government has invoked the notwithstanding clause, this time to defend a trio of transgender laws.

The Alberta government has invoked the Charter’s notwithstanding clause to protect from legal challenge a trio of laws affecting transgender youth and adults.

It’s the second time in less than a month Premier Danielle Smith’s government has applied the clause to a bill — both times saying it had little choice because children’s well-being hung in the balance.

• The information you need to know, sent directly to you: Download the CTV News App

Smith’s government introduced a bill in the house Tuesday which, if passed, invokes the clause overriding Charter rights in the three laws.

In a news conference the day before, Smith said the move was necessary because the health of children affected could be jeopardized if challenges to the laws are tied up in court for a long time.

“This government does not turn to the notwithstanding clause unless the stakes warrant it, and in this case, the stakes could not be higher,” Smith said. “This is one of the most consequential actions our government will take during our time in office.”

The three laws were passed more than a year ago and affect transgender and gender-diverse youth in health care, in schools and in competitive sports. Constitutional court challenges have been launched against two of the laws.

The focus of much of the legal debate surrounds the law on health care. It prohibits doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16 for purposes of gender reassignment.

LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have challenged that in court, calling it unconstitutional and a threat to the health of gender-diverse youth. This summer, a judge agreed and put that part of the law on hold pending a full airing of the issues.

The Canadian Medical Association is also challenging the law, calling it unprecedented interference in the doctor-patient relationship.

A second law makes changes in schools. It requires parents to be notified if a child under 16 wants to change their name or pronoun at school for reasons related to their gender identity. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups are also challenging that on constitutional grounds, but for now it remains in force.

The government of Saskatchewan passed a similar school pronoun requirement law in 2023 and invoked the notwithstanding clause to shield it.

The third law compels schools, colleges and other governing bodies of amateur sport to adopt policies to ensure only those born female play in female-only leagues and divisions.

The notwithstanding clause is a rarely used constitutional convention that exists to ensure balance between the courts and duly elected governments. Governments can invoke the clause but must renew it every five years, tying the use of the clause to the normal term of a government.

Smith said by using it in this case, they are following the wishes of Albertans.

“These measures reflect the views of an overwhelming majority of Albertans, and it is our responsibility to make sure that they are not overturned,” she said.

“These lawsuits could take years to resolve, including possible appeals to the Supreme Court. These delays are not acceptable to this government when children are in harm’s way.”

Bennett Jensen, the legal director for Egale, one of the advocacy groups challenging the government’s laws, said Tuesday that the court process being inconvenient isn’t a valid excuse for taking such drastic measures.

“That would be laughable if it wasn’t so deeply offensive,” said Jensen. “I’m almost speechless.”

He said the government is pushing misinformation in its attempt to justify the laws, and pointed to the court injunction over the summer where a judge agreed with the evidence presented by his team rather than the government’s filings.

“The government is targeting a misunderstood, vulnerable minority population, and is unwilling to defend itself in court on the basis of that targeting,” he said.

Jensen also said that just because the government invoked the notwithstanding clause, doesn’t mean Egale will be dropping its legal battle.

“We’ll be able to make our next steps clear likely in the coming days or weeks, but the fight isn’t over.”

The health law, along with the treatment restrictions, also prohibits gender-reassignment surgery for those under 18.

“We cannot and will not take the risk of a child undergoing medical, hormonal or surgical interventions that could permanently limit or eliminate choices they may want to make as an adult to have children of their own one day,” Smith said.

On Monday, advocates gathered at the legislature in expectation the government would invoke the notwithstanding clause.

Marni Panas, a transgender woman, told reporters the government was attacking human rights.

“It is not just targeting one group. It’s attacking the very foundation of our democracy,” she said. “If we allow this to continue, nobody’s rights are safe.”

Quin Bergman, an Edmonton high school student who skipped class to join others on the legislature grounds, said their sibling was driven to suicide by an onslaught of hate toward transgender people.

“It’s stuff like what the government is doing that makes people lose hope,” Bergman said.

Dr. Margot Burnell, the head of the Canadian Medical Association, said Tuesday that it’s deeply disappointed in the government using the notwithstanding clause, saying it undermines patients’ rights and doctors’ judgement, along with their ability to provide the best clinical care.

“This kind of political intrusion into evidence-based care is unacceptable and risks setting a precedent that affects other national health issues, such as vaccination or reproductive health,” Burnell said in a statement.

Smith’s government also invoked the notwithstanding clause on Oct. 27 to end a provincewide teachers strike and impose a labour contract that teachers previously rejected.

Smith said students had been out for weeks and that the government believed this was too much of a social, emotional and educational hardship for them to bear.

That move incited widespread criticism of government overreach, including by civil liberties organizations, labour unions, Amnesty International’s Canadian chapter, lawyer groups and the Anglican Diocese of Edmonton. It also led some United Conservative Party caucus members to say they have been on the receiving end of a barrage of calls and emails from constituents decrying the government’s decision.

The Alberta Teachers’ Association has filed a legal challenge against the government’s back-to-work order, arguing the use of the notwithstanding clause was improper and, therefore, invalid. A hearing is set to take place in Edmonton on Thursday.

Jason Schilling, the head of the teachers’ association, said using the notwithstanding clause again “demonstrates a flagrant disregard for basic human rights.”

Schilling, in a statement, added, “Normalizing the use of the notwithstanding clause is a dangerous practice. This overreaching legislation will harm vulnerable students instead of providing any sense of protection.”

Justice Minister Mickey Amery, speaking alongside Smith on Monday, dismissed concerns about the government’s repeated use of the clause.

“At the end of the day, I’ll stand by this,” Amery said, adding that the government’s new bill also overrides any right set out in the Alberta Bill of Rights and the provincial human rights code.

“We’re prepared again to use every single legal and constitutional tool to make sure that the health and well-being of our children are protected.”

Opposition Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said the government using the notwithstanding clause yet again shows they are “drunk on power” with tangible and potentially tragic consequences.

“It’s not fair, it’s not right, and these are real human beings that could be very badly hurt,” he said.

By Jack Farrell and Aaron Sousa

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 18, 2025.