B.C. judge awards patient $180K after 'traumatic' eye surgery

A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has awarded more than $180,000 to a man who suffered extreme pain, vision loss and facial disfigurement following a "traumatic" eye surgery.
Russell Selby Anderson of Victoria underwent two elective surgeries to correct his vision and reduce his dependence on glasses and contact lenses in September 2016.
During the second procedure to repair Anderson's left eye, Dr. Gabriel Chu found the artificial lens he had inserted was defective. The surgeon removed the faulty lens and replaced it, which prolonged the surgery.
The 59-year-old Anderson left the Surrey clinic suffering acute eye pain and nausea. Three to four weeks later, he lost all vision in his left eye and subsequent clinic visits determined his cornea had been damaged and would need to be replaced.
Anderson waited a year before a cornea transplant donor was found. The procedure restored his vision but he had developed ptosis – a drooping of the eyelid – over his left eye.
Two more surgeries to repair the eyelid were unsuccessful, and while his vision was back, the eyelid now drooped enough to significantly obstruct his vision, the court heard.
In Anderson's claim of negligence against Chu, he argued the surgeon damaged both his cornea and eyelid during surgery, causing extreme pain, vision loss, emotional suffering, impaired income earning capacity and loss of enjoyment of life.
'THE SURGERY WAS TRAUMATIC'
Justice Lisa Warren found that Chu performed the surgery negligently, and did not adequately disclose the risks of corneal damage, permanent vision loss and ptosis prior to the surgery.
The surgery on Anderson's left eye was expected to take 10 to 15 minutes, but the complication with the defective lens extended the procedure to 52 minutes, the court heard.
Anderson testified that by the time Chu began removing the lens, he was in agonizing pain, yelling out and kicking his legs as he could feel the surgeon's tools cutting into his eye.
Despite the prolonged procedure, Chu did not provide additional anesthetic, but instead told Anderson to be quiet and stop moving, the former patient told the court.
"I have found that Dr. Chu's negligence caused the injuries for which Mr. Anderson claims damages," the judge wrote in her decision published Wednesday.
"Mr. Anderson has endured considerable physical symptoms and limitations as a result. The surgery itself was traumatic. He could feel sharp instruments in his eye and was subjected to excruciating pain while the defective [lens] was cut into pieces and extracted. He continued to suffer from eye pain for about a month following the surgery and became disfigured by the ptosis."
The judge found Anderson continues to suffer from facial disfigurement more than six years after the surgery, and "now lives with dry eyes, ongoing headaches, double vision, and impaired depth perception."
While the judge found in Anderson's favour in seeking compensation for pain, vision loss, emotional suffering and loss of enjoyment of life, she ruled Anderson did not prove his loss of past and future earning capacity as a result of the botched surgery.
The judge also dismissed Anderson's claims for aggravated and punitive damages, finding no evidence that Chu operated his clinic outside the professional standards of the B.C. College of Physicians and Surgeons.
For his pain, vision loss, emotional suffering and loss of enjoyment of life, Anderson was awarded $180,000 by the court. The judge awarded an additional $7,765.83 for Anderson's associated health-care costs.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories

Pass federal gun bill without delay, shooting victim's father urges on anniversary of mass killing
The father of a woman who was fatally shot in October by her former partner is urging senators to pass a federal gun-control bill without delay.
Senators were intimidated, had their privilege breached, Speaker rules
Any attempt to intimidate a senator while in the process of fulfilling their duties is a breach of their privilege, even if the effort is ultimately unsuccessful, the Speaker of the Senate ruled Tuesday.
Here is Canada's unseasonably mild December forecast
December is predicted to be unseasonably mild across Canada, thanks to a "moderate-to-strong" El Nino and human-caused warming. Warming and precipitation trends will be stronger in some parts of the country than others, and severe weather is still possible, meteorologists say.
Two Canadian citizens confirmed dead in Antigua: Global Affairs
Global Affairs Canada has confirmed the death of two Canadian citizens in Antigua and Barbuda, news that comes amid reports from local officials that a woman and child drowned last week at Devil’s Bridge.
Heavy fighting in Gaza halts most aid delivery and leaves civilians with few places to seek safety
Israeli forces battled Hamas militants across Gaza on Wednesday after expanding their ground offensive to its second-largest city, further shrinking the area where Palestinians can seek safety and halting the distribution of vital aid across most of the territory.
DEVELOPING Bank of Canada to announce interest rate decision today
The Bank of Canada is set to announce its interest rate decision this morning as forecasters widely expect the central bank to continue holding its key rate steady.
opinion Tom Mulcair: Poilievre keeps scoring into the Liberals' empty net
In his column for CTVNews.ca, former NDP leader Tom Mulcair says Pierre Poilievre's new 'Housing Hell' video dealt a 'devastating' blow to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his Liberals, whose cupboard seems empty of big ideas.
Nearly 70 victim impact statements expected at Nathaniel Veltman sentencing
As the Crown and the defence discussed legal matters ahead of the sentencing hearing of Nathaniel Veltman, the court heard that 68 victim impact statements are expected to be submitted.
MPs to vote on referring 'serious error' Speaker Fergus made to House affairs committee for study
MPs will be deciding Wednesday whether House of Commons Speaker Greg Fergus' video in his traditional Speaker's garb that played at a partisan event constitutes a 'serious error of judgment' and merits a committee probe.